CreatorsDream.com - creating our realities...

The following is a comment from yank33 - a guest poster on the Underwater Anomalies photo album in the CreatorDream Gallery. I am reposting it here because I find it very interesting. I am also having to close down the ability to leave comments in the gallery due to problems of being notified when someone posts comments in the gallery. So I am moving the most relevant comments to the forums.

Greetings.
When i first saw these images in your video several things jumped to mind. I will just throw some of these ideas out here:

A) Occasionally digital photos when pointed at brilliantly reflective surfaces at 'a perfect angle' will produce an effect of a reflection on the inside of the camera lens. This is an argument often associated with pictures people don't 'approve' of.

B) It may be anomaly related to how Google Earth has pieced the millions of photos together to create a '3d' globe effect.

C) The possibility of ruins is very high, especially if many of them have been completely isolated to an open air environment (eg, frozen in or under ice). Most ruins that have not been actively excavated or reconstructed can barely be perceived from the ground, and are often only discovered by a photographic 'flyby'. Just to site one example in South America, it wasn't until the late 80's that a geologist flew over the southern peninsula of South America and examined his own photos for signs of glacial movement. What he discovered was that the 'broken up' river systems of the area (hundreds of miles long) were not as random they appeared from the ground. It was in fact a series of man-made canals making up the largest hydroponic garden in existence (thousands of years old). Closer inspection by archaeologists produced evidence (pottery shards etc) that this area was in contact with 'larger' more classically understood civilizations in the north of the continent. A rough estimate made by the researchers was that this area could have produced enough crops to feed more than 130 million people.

D) Most researchers in the field of Atlantis theory
are searching for the actual physical ruins of a great civilization. There are more open interpretations now available on the web that suggest that Atlantis was more of a concept, or represented a time frame or era. if the latter theory is correct, than you may well have found part of it. it is highly likely that, soon with the continual defrosting of the planet, these structures may appear around the globe in surprising places.

E) Underwater base research did come to mind, however, the research being done on photographs of the moon and mars structures seemed to fit better. Many of the structures and areas of interest that are being highlighted in this field are being found in proximity to, on the edge of, or even inside craters. This correlation of research in relation to your potential discovery seems hardly productive, but i thought it would be interesting to point out the kind of structural analysis of structures being done with orbital photos.

Sociologically, i would not be surprised in the least if these were actual ruins. The modern (since approximately 1300 AD) western scientific paradigm has always promoted its completeness and certainty about many areas of 'history', 'discovery' and 'analysis'. I use these terms in quotations, as an incredible amount of data in many fields, having been presented as ultimate fact and therefore foundation of fields, is being proven false, invalid, and most importantly inconsistent. As a result, much of the historic anthropological, archaeological and geological data about previously colonized areas of the planet are being re-examined. Many of the classical interpretations of civilizations, their history, social evolution, social structure, geographical movements have been just plain wrong, because the primary sources of the data were wrong. In many cases delusions of many of the source authors are being specifically pinpointed as resulting from their operational paradigm.

You may have found some of the missing links or 'way points' between the 'discovered' cultures spread across the expanse of the continent. In fact, if they have been truly preserved from currents (air and water) in a relatively stagnant state they will likely be in a much better condition than other underwater ruins found in seas and off the coasts of islands. I am supposing these are ruins, that were once above water. If they are in fact structures which were meant to be under water, i am mystified.

Anyway just some ideas there. I sincerely hope your investigation turns something up. It would be a fantastic story: 'Man discovers 50,000 year old ruins via Google Earth'. On a side note, someone has recently successfully discovered ruins in the shallow waters of the north sea via Google Earth, so who knows :)

Posted by yank33 (guest) on Fri 25 Apr 2008 09:52:06 AM CDT (83.176.53.133)